|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Editor's Call ARTICLES Conservation Bank At East Plum Creek Colorado Chapter of the Wildlife Society Neighborhood Approach to Watershed Planning FEATURES Legal Developments Research Summaries Volume 15, Number 2 Summer 2004 Volume 15, Number 1 Spring 2004 Volume 14, Number 3 Fall/Winter 2003 Volume 14, Number 2 Summer 2003 Volume 14, Number 1 Spring 2003 Volume 13, Number 3, Fall 2002 PREVIOUS ISSUES |
Legal Developmentsby Larry MacDonnellColorado Water LawThe Colorado Supreme Court decided only one case since our last report, Trail's End Ranch v. Colorado Division of Water Resources. In this case the Division 2 Engineer had ordered Trail's End to cease diversions on Spruce Creek from points other than its decreed point of diversion. The Court agreed that such diversions require a court-approved change of point of use, upholding the order. Other Water Litigation The battle over the fate of the Missouri River continues, with the most recent federal court decision essentially upholding the river operating plan ("Master Manual") developed by the Army Corps of Engineers. Litigation in different circuits was consolidated for this decision. Corps' management of the Missouri is governed by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Under this law the Corps is to manage storage and flows for a wide range of benefits including flood control, navigation, water supply, and fish and wildlife. Because the court found the weight to be given to particular benefits is to be determined by the Corps, it deferred to the Corps' determination in the Master Manual. Endangered Species Act A petition for certiorari has been filed with the U.S. Supreme Court in a case holding Congress has power to regulate species of invertebrates found only in caves in a limited portion of Texas. In GDF Realty Investments v. Norton, plaintiffs assert Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce does not extend to regulation of such species. Public Lands The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously upheld actions of the Bureau of Land Management respecting management of certain wilderness study areas in southern Utah against a challenge the agency was failing to protect their wilderness characteristics. In Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance the Court found no mandatory requirement to limit the use of off road vehicles in these wilderness study areas -- reflecting the more hands-off posture taken by this Court in recent years. The Court characterized land use plans as guiding and constraining actions but not prescribing them. Clean Water Act -- Section 404 | |||||||||||
| Posted on September 18, 2004. |